More than any other author in English, Shakespeare has been able to bring to life individuals who have the mark of reality about them. Throughout the dramas, Shakespeare tries to avoid the use of type characters, working instead to individualize his creations through patterns of speech and thought. His great contemporary, Ben Jonson, prided himself on his ability to capture the essence of types in his dramas. Shakespeare, on the other hand, strives always to achieve distinction among his kings, fools, lovers, and villains.
The absence of documentary proof of Shakespeare's education is often a part of anti-Stratfordian arguments. The free King's New School in Stratford, establishedwas about 0. This lack of documentation is taken by many anti-Stratfordians as evidence that Shakespeare had little or no education.
The author's vocabulary is calculated to be between 17, and 29, words. The appearance of Shakespeare's six surviving authenticated  signatures, which they characterise as "an illiterate scrawl", is interpreted as indicating that he was illiterate or barely literate.
Spelling of Shakespeare's name Shakespeare's name was hyphenated on the cover of the quarto edition of the Sonnets. In his surviving signatures William Shakespeare did not spell his name as it appears on most Shakespeare title pages. His surname was spelled inconsistently in both literary and non-literary documents, with the most variation observed in those that were written by hand.
This hyphen use is construed to indicate a pseudonym by most anti-Stratfordians,  who argue that fictional descriptive names such as "Master Shoe-tie" and "Sir Luckless Woo-all" were often hyphenated in plays, and pseudonyms such as "Tom Tell-truth" were also sometimes hyphenated.
Aristocrats such as Derby and Oxford supposedly used pseudonyms because of a prevailing " stigma of print ", a social convention that putatively restricted their literary works to private and courtly audiences—as opposed to commercial endeavours—at the risk of social disgrace if violated.
Bacon to avoid the consequences of advocating a more republican form of government and Marlowe to avoid imprisonment or worse after faking his death and fleeing the country.
Anti-Stratfordians say that nothing in the documentary record explicitly identifies Shakespeare as a writer;  that the evidence instead supports a career as a businessman and real-estate investor; that any prominence he might have had in the London theatrical world aside from his role as a front for the true author was because of his money-lending, trading in theatrical properties, acting, and being a shareholder.
They also believe that any evidence of a literary career was falsified as part of the effort to shield the true author's identity. They identify him with such characters as the literary thief Poet-Ape in Ben Jonson 's poem of the same name and the foolish poetry-lover Gullio in the university play The Return from Parnassus performed c.
Such characters are taken as broad hints indicating that the London theatrical world knew Shakespeare was a front for an anonymous author. Similarly, praises of "Shakespeare" the writer, such as those found in the First Folioare explained as references to the real author's pen-name, not the man from Stratford.
The language of the will is mundane and unpoetic and makes no mention of personal papers, books, poems, or the 18 plays that remained unpublished at the time of his death.
Its only theatrical reference—monetary gifts to fellow actors to buy mourning rings —was interlined after the will had been written, casting suspicion on the authenticity of the bequests. Oxford had died infive years earlier.
|Analysis of Shakespeare's Sonnets and Paraphrase in Modern English||But the policy page on its website marlowe-society.|
|Who really wrote Shakespeare? | Culture | The Guardian||See results Questions to Ask Yourself While Reading So, you know that the first reading for the poem you are doing literary analysis for requires you to just be able to summarize what the poem is about.|
The earliest printed image of the figure, in Sir William Dugdale 's Antiquities of Warwickshirediffers greatly from its present appearance. Some authorship theorists argue that the figure originally portrayed a man clutching a sack of grain or wool that was later altered to help conceal the identity of the true author.
Spielmann published a painting of the monument that had been executed before the restoration, which showed it very similar to its present-day appearance. He became an actor and shareholder in the Lord Chamberlain's Men later the King's Menthe playing company that owned the Globe Theatrethe Blackfriars Theatreand exclusive rights to produce Shakespeare's plays from to On 22 April , The New York Times published a survey of American Shakespeare professors on the Shakespeare authorship question.
To the question of whether there is good reason to question Shakespeare's authorship, 6 per cent answered "yes", and 11 percent "possibly".
A Guide to the Literary-Analysis Essay This guide is designed to help you write better literary-analysis essays for your English classes. It contains diagrams, explanations, and many examples to take you. But the policy page on its website (attheheels.com) specifically states that the society is not dedicated to proving that Marlowe was the true author of the Shakespeare canon.
Feb 01, · It may seem like doing analysis of poetry is easier than, say, analyzing books, but, don't be fooled by its size. Poetry, for most people, is one of the most difficult types of Reviews: 2) On the contrary, usually majority of the scholars believe that William Shakespeare, “the glover's son from Stratford-upon-Avon” is the true author of Shakespearean literary canon.
These pro-Shakespearean scholars find that “the Oxfordian claims to be groundless, . On 22 April , The New York Times published a survey of American Shakespeare professors on the Shakespeare authorship question. To the question of whether there is good reason to question Shakespeare's authorship, 6 per cent answered "yes", and 11 percent "possibly".